... would you want a Federer, a Schumacher, a Woods etc in your chosen game? These names are abnormally dominant in their sports, making most finals, and not allowing the also rans to rise to the top or show how good they are. It must be so frustrating to have a freak of nature up against you all the time. But they are good to watch.
... would you want a Federer, a Schumacher, a Woods etc in your chosen game? These names are abnormally dominant in their sports, making most finals, and not allowing the also rans to rise to the top or show how good they are. It must be so frustrating to have a freak of nature up against you all the time. But they are good to watch.
Registered: Jan 2004 Posts: 23875 - Threads: 884 Location: Wandsworth
Quote:
Aaron wrote on 31-01-2010 10:19 AM
... would you want a Federer, a Schumacher, a Woods etc in your chosen game? These names are abnormally dominant in their sports, making most finals, and not allowing the also rans to rise to the top or show how good they are. It must be so frustrating to have a freak of nature up against you all the time. But they are good to watch.
Registered: Feb 2004 Posts: 19861 - Threads: 489 Location: milk n' beans
[Edited by Syfoon on 31-01-2010 15:39 PM]
No doubt most people would think I'd be a Schumey.
Nope. Correct ballpark, wrong game.
Someone like a Martin Brundle. Best crash in F1 history, VERY successful at tintop (so much better then F1, I'd murder several people to even race at Le Man!) endurance racing, now gets paid to talk for 2 hours about F1.
![[HarderFaster] - Work Hard, Play Harder!](/images/mainbanner_top1.gif)
31-01-2010 10:19 AM
